Bitcoin ETF Showdown: Between GBTC And IBIT, Who's Winning The Race？ - iShares Bitcoin Trust (NASDAQ:IBIT

Benzinga

2024-07-05 23:50

In the world of Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), two names stand out: Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (NYSE:GBTC) and iShares Bitcoin Trust (NASDAQ:IBIT).

　　In the world of Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), two names stand out: Grayscale Bitcoin Trust GBTC and iShares Bitcoin Trust IBIT.

　　While both track the same index, the CME CF Benchmarks Bitcoin BTC/USD Reference Rate-New York Variant, their performance, assets under management (AUM), and technicals reveal some intriguing contrasts.

　　Despite GBTCs superior price performance, IBIT boasts a larger AUM.

　　Lets dive into the details to understand this puzzling disparity.

　　A Tale of Two Bitcoin Titans

　　Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC)and iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)are categorized under currency ETFs. Both were launched in January 2024, with GBTC debuting on the 11th and IBIT on the 5th.

　　Despite the similarities, their financial metrics and market traction differ significantly.

Metric	GBTC	IBIT
Issuer	Digital Currency Group, Inc.	BlackRock, Inc.
Expense Ratio	1.50%	0.12%
AUM	$17B	$19B
Shares Outstanding	309M	540M

　　Data Source: VettaFi ETFdb

　　Performance Metrics: GBTC Shines Bright

　　GBTC has delivered impressive returns over various periods, outshining IBIT, which lacks long-term performance data due to its recent inception.

Period	GBTC	IBIT
1 Week	-0.87%	-0.78%
2 Weeks	-6.16%	-6.00%
1 Month	-10.70%	-10.66%
3 Months	-8.59%	-8.40%

　　Data Source: VettaFi ETFdb

　　Despite GBTC‘s stellar performance, it trails IBIT in AUM. As of now, IBIT holds $19 billion compared to GBTC’s $17 billion.

　　Technical Analysis: Neck and Neck

　　Both ETFs show similar technical indicators, reflecting their parallel tracking of Bitcoins reference rate.

　　However, GBTCs higher performance figures might suggest better investor sentiment or trust.

Technical Indicator	GBTC	IBIT
20 Day MA	$57.58	$36.94
60 Day MA	$57.89	$37.09
MACD 15 Period	-2.51	-1.59
MACD 100 Period	-3.46	-2.14
RSI 10 Day	39.07	39.31
RSI 20 Day	43.1	43.21
RSI 30 Day	46.06	45.97
Lower Bollinger Band (10 Day)	$52.29	$33.55
Upper Bollinger Band (10 Day)	$57.81	$37.08
Lower Bollinger Band (30 Day)	$52.71	$33.82
Upper Bollinger Band (30 Day)	$65.05	$41.71

　　Data Source: VettaFi ETFdb

　　Decoding the Discrepancy

　　So why does IBIT, with its modest returns, have a higher AUM？ The answer might lie in investor confidence and fee structures. BlackRock's lower expense ratio of 0.12% compared to GBTC's 1.50% likely appeals to cost-conscious investors, driving larger inflows despite the lag in performance.

　　Additionally, BlackRock‘s reputation and vast resources could contribute to greater investor trust and thus a higher AUM. On the other hand, GBTC’s higher expense ratio might deter some investors, despite its better price performance.

　　The comparison between GBTC and IBIT underscores a classic investment conundrum: choosing between higher performance and lower fees.

　　While GBTC dazzles with its returns, IBIT attracts with its affordability and brand trust. For investors, the decision hinges on their priority—immediate performance or long-term cost efficiency.

Disclaimer:The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.